Apify

Apify is actor platform for scraping and agents, with Crawlee as the open-source core. We compare it in Browser APIs. The trade-off is being marked No on CDP endpoint, where Browserbase records Yes.

What is Apify?

Apify — Actor platform for scraping and agents, with Crawlee as the open-source core. Apify is a compute platform where scrapers run as containerised Actors, billed in compute units, with a marketplace of thousands of prebuilt ones. Crawlee, its open-source crawler library, is the piece most engineers use directly and handles browser pooling, session rotation and fingerprinting. You do not get a CDP endpoint to connect to from outside — you deploy code that runs browsers inside the platform. Built by Apify Technologies. Founded 2015. Series A. Open source under Apache-2.0.

We track it in 1 comparison — Browser APIs — so every claim below is a cell in a table you can open and check rather than an impression. Across those rosters it sits against 12 other tools, and what follows is where it visibly separates from them.

Where it gives ground.

  • CDP endpoint — No. Browserbase records Yes.
  • Session replay — No. Browserbase records Yes.
  • Human handoff — No. Browserless records Yes.
  • Pricing model — per-credit, 9th of 13. Browserbase records per-hour.

None of these disqualify it on their own. They are the fields to check against your own requirements before you commit, because they are the ones where a competitor genuinely does better.

Provenance. 22 of 26 tracked fields carry a value for Apify, and 6 of those cite a document you can open. Last verified 2026-07-01. Every figure keeps its own provenance — measured by us, claimed by the vendor, inferred, or community-reported — and we would rather print a dash than a guess.

Its nearest neighbour in our data is Airtop. Apify is ahead on Open-source core (Partial against No) and File downloads (Yes against Partial). Airtop takes Human handoff (Yes against No) and CDP endpoint (Partial against No). That pattern repeats across the rest of the roster — see Apify alternatives for the other rivals, each compared the same way.

At a glance
Company
Apify Technologies
Founded
2015
Funding
Series A
Licence
Apache-2.0 (open source)
Fields we track
22 of 26
Last verified
2026-07-01

Apify in Browser APIs

Ranked against 13 tools across 26 sourced fields. Open the full Browser APIs table.

Not really a browser API and shouldn't be evaluated as one — it is a place to run scraping code, with a marketplace attached. Crawlee is excellent and free. Choose Apify when the job is a scheduled pipeline with storage and monitoring, not when an agent needs a browser right now.

Where it lands in this roster
CDP endpoint
No12th of 13
Inferred
Session replay
No10th of 13
Inferred
Stealth mode
Yes1st of 13
Vendor-claimedverified 2026-07-01source
Playwright
Yes1st of 13
Vendor-claimedverified 2026-07-01source
Live view
Yes1st of 13
Inferred
Human handoff
No8th of 13
Inferred
GitHub stars
17,0002nd of 5
Inferred
Puppeteer
Yes1st of 13
Vendor-claimedverified 2026-07-01source

When to use Apify

Apify is the right call in these situations, each one drawn from a field we actually record:

  • Scheduled crawls that need storage, queues and monitoring.
  • Reusing an existing Actor instead of writing a scraper.
  • Teams standardising on Crawlee.

When not to use Apify

Reach for something else when any of the following is a requirement rather than a nice-to-have:

  • CDP endpoint. Apify records No on the Browser APIs table. Browserbase records Yes on the same field. If that is a hard requirement rather than a preference, start elsewhere.
  • Session replay. Apify records No on the Browser APIs table. Browserbase records Yes on the same field. If that is a hard requirement rather than a preference, start elsewhere.
  • Human handoff. Apify records No on the Browser APIs table. Browserless records Yes on the same field. If that is a hard requirement rather than a preference, start elsewhere.
  • Pricing model. Apify records per-credit, 9th of 13 in the Browser APIs roster. Browserbase records per-hour on the same field. If that is a hard requirement rather than a preference, start elsewhere.

We publish this block because a comparison that only lists what a tool is good at is marketing. Every figure above sits on the same page as its source, and the field definitions are on the category tables if you want to check how we measured them.

Tools compared alongside Apify

Everything below shares at least one comparison category with Apify, ordered by how much overlap there is. For the reasoning on each — which fields it wins, which it loses — see Apify alternatives.
Natural-language browser API — describe the page, skip the selectors

Recent Apify changes

We have not logged a dated change for Apify yet. The timeline fills in as pricing moves, features ship and things get deprecated.

Sources and gaps

What we don't know. 4 of the 26 fields we track for Apify are still blank: Anti-bot pass rate, Cold start, Max concurrency and Per browser-hour. Those render as dashes rather than as zeroes or assumptions, because an empty cell and a bad cell are not the same thing and only one of them is honest. If you know any of these figures and can point at a document, tell us.

Every figure on this page traces back to a document you can open. Where a vendor claims a number we could not reproduce, the cell says so.