Direct EPP (own accreditation)
Direct EPP (own accreditation) is become the registrar: ICANN accreditation plus an EPP client per registry. We compare it in Domain APIs. It is one of only 4 of 12 tools in its roster with .au support. The trade-off is being 14th of 14 on Spend to first call ($7,500 up front).
What is Direct EPP (own accreditation)?
Direct EPP (own accreditation) — Become the registrar: ICANN accreditation plus an EPP client per registry. The baseline against which every provider above is a convenience purchase. You apply for ICANN accreditation, sign a registry-registrar agreement with each registry you want to sell, post whatever deposit or letter of credit they demand, and speak EPP to each of them directly. You get registry cost with no margin and total control of the lifecycle. You also get compliance obligations, data escrow, abuse handling and an on-call rotation. We carry it as the do-it-yourself baseline, not as a vendor.
We track it in 1 comparison — Domain APIs — so every claim below is a cell in a table you can open and check rather than an impression. Across those rosters it sits against 14 other tools, and what follows is where it visibly separates from them.
Where it wins.
- .au support — Yes, which only 4 of 12 tools here manage.
- Pricing basis — wholesale, tied for best across 3 of 15 tools.
- .com renewal — $10.98 /yr, the best figure of the 15 here.
- Rate limit — 600 req/min, the best figure of the 4 here.
- Webhooks / events — Partial, which only 5 of 15 tools here manage.
Each of those is ranked against the whole roster on its category page, not against a hand-picked subset, so a first place here means first of everything we list.
Where it gives ground.
- Spend to first call — $7,500 up front, the weakest of the 14 here. Porkbun records $0 up front.
- Renewal price in API — No. Porkbun records Yes.
- DNS record API — No. Porkbun records Yes.
- API auth — epp-xml, the weakest of the 15 here. Gandi records bearer-token.
None of these disqualify it on their own. They are the fields to check against your own requirements before you commit, because they are the ones where a competitor genuinely does better.
Provenance. 24 of 26 tracked fields carry a value for Direct EPP (own accreditation), and 1 of those cite a document you can open. Last verified 2026-07-23. Every figure keeps its own provenance — measured by us, claimed by the vendor, inferred, or community-reported — and we would rather print a dash than a guess.
Its nearest neighbour in our data is Dynadot. Direct EPP (own accreditation) is ahead on Sandbox / OTE (Yes against No) and Pricing basis (wholesale against retail). Dynadot takes Spend to first call ($0 up front against $7,500 up front) and Renewal price in API (Yes against No). That pattern repeats across the rest of the roster — see Direct EPP (own accreditation) alternatives for the other rivals, each compared the same way.
- Fields we track
- 24 of 26
- Last verified
- 2026-07-23
Direct EPP (own accreditation) in Domain APIs
Ranked against 15 tools across 26 sourced fields. Open the full Domain APIs table.Included so the convenience premium above is visible, not as a recommendation. Below roughly a hundred thousand names under management, the accreditation fees, escrow, abuse handling and compliance load cost more than every reseller margin on this page combined.
- Renewal price in API
- No14th of 14 Inferred
- .au support
- Yes1st of 12 Inferred
- Pricing basis
- wholesale1st of 15 Inferred
- DNS record API
- No15th of 15 Inferred
- .com renewal
- $10.98 /yr1st of 15 Inferred
- API auth
- epp-xml15th of 15 Inferred
- Rate limit
- 600 req/min1st of 4 Inferred
When to use Direct EPP (own accreditation)
Direct EPP (own accreditation) is the right call in these situations, each one drawn from a field we actually record:
- Operators already carrying six figures of domains under management.
- Registries and large hosts building their own registrar.
- Understanding what the margin above actually pays for.
- .au support is your binding constraint. Direct EPP (own accreditation) records Yes, which only 4 of the 12 tools in the Domain APIs roster do.
- Pricing basis is your binding constraint. Direct EPP (own accreditation) records wholesale, the best figure in the Domain APIs roster. We define that field as what the API charges you.
- .com renewal is your binding constraint. Direct EPP (own accreditation) records $10.98 /yr, the best figure in the Domain APIs roster.
- Rate limit is your binding constraint. Direct EPP (own accreditation) records 600 req/min, the best figure in the Domain APIs roster.
When not to use Direct EPP (own accreditation)
Reach for something else when any of the following is a requirement rather than a nice-to-have:
- Spend to first call. Direct EPP (own accreditation) records $7,500 up front, the weakest of the 14 tools in the Domain APIs roster. Porkbun records $0 up front on the same field. If that is a hard requirement rather than a preference, start elsewhere.
- Renewal price in API. Direct EPP (own accreditation) records No on the Domain APIs table. Porkbun records Yes on the same field. If that is a hard requirement rather than a preference, start elsewhere.
- DNS record API. Direct EPP (own accreditation) records No on the Domain APIs table. Porkbun records Yes on the same field. If that is a hard requirement rather than a preference, start elsewhere.
- API auth. Direct EPP (own accreditation) records epp-xml, the weakest of the 15 tools in the Domain APIs roster. Gandi records bearer-token on the same field. If that is a hard requirement rather than a preference, start elsewhere.
- Privacy via API. Direct EPP (own accreditation) records not-in-api, the weakest of the 15 tools in the Domain APIs roster. Porkbun records free-and-default on the same field. If that is a hard requirement rather than a preference, start elsewhere.
We publish this block because a comparison that only lists what a tool is good at is marketing. Every figure above sits on the same page as its source, and the field definitions are on the category tables if you want to check how we measured them.
Tools compared alongside Direct EPP (own accreditation)
Everything below shares at least one comparison category with Direct EPP (own accreditation), ordered by how much overlap there is. For the reasoning on each — which fields it wins, which it loses — see Direct EPP (own accreditation) alternatives.Recent Direct EPP (own accreditation) changes
- 2025-09-01 · pricingVerisign's next .com step landsA second seven per cent increase in as many years took .com wholesale to roughly US$10.98 before the ICANN transaction fee. Providers passed it through at different speeds — the wholesale platforms almost immediately, several retail registrars a quarter later while absorbing the difference.
- 2024-09-01 · pricingVerisign raises .com wholesale to US$10.26The annual contractual increase moved the .com wholesale price up seven per cent. Every retail and wholesale figure on this page inherits it, which is why comparing registrars on .com price alone is a moving target rather than a decision.
Sources and gaps
What we don't know. 2 of the 26 fields we track for Direct EPP (own accreditation) are still blank: Min prepaid balance and TLDs offered. Those render as dashes rather than as zeroes or assumptions, because an empty cell and a bad cell are not the same thing and only one of them is honest. If you know any of these figures and can point at a document, tell us.
- www.icann.org/resources/pages/accreditation-2012-02-25-enSpend to first call · Vendor-claimed · verified 2026-07-23