Overall in llm apis
8of 18 · score 64.2
Data coverage
70%
19 of 27 fields sourced
Best for
- •Workloads that must survive any single vendor disappearing
- •On-premise or air-gapped deployments with a recognisable licence
- •Fine-tuning on your own data without a vendor in the loop
Strong on
- +AU region Yes 1/18
Weak on
- −Effort control No 12/18Better: Anthropic: Yes
- −Audio in/out No 11/18Better: OpenAI: Partial
- −Tool use Partial 13/18Better: Anthropic: Yes
vs Qwen
- •Ahead on Image input: Yes vs Partial
- •Ahead on Open weights: Yes vs Partial
- •Behind on Trains on your data: No vs Partial
- •Behind on Effort control: No vs Partial
How Meta Llama scores among 18 llm apis19 of 27 fields known
Capability7
Performance2
TTFT p50
—
Output tok/s
—
Pricing4
$/M input
—
$/M output
—
$/M cache read
—
Batch discount
—
Agentic6
Tool use
Partial
13/18
Leader: Anthropic · Yes
· 2026-01-15
Schema output
Partial
11/18
Leader: Anthropic · Yes
· 2026-01-15
Effort control
No
12/18
Leader: Anthropic · Yes
· 2026-01-15
Computer use
No
5/18
Leader: Anthropic · Yes
· 2026-01-15
MCP support
No
6/18
Leader: Anthropic · Yes
· 2026-01-15
Cache TTL
Host-dependent
· 2026-01-15
Governance & continuity6
Continuity policy
Effectively unlimited, and the reason Llama matters strategically. The weights are downloadable and mirrored, so no vendor can retire the model out from under you, if a host drops it, three others still serve it, or you run it yourself. Meta may stop releasing new generations, but nothing already published disappears.
· 2026-01-15
Notice period
—
Pinnable versions1st
Yes
1/18
· 2026-01-15
Zero retention
Partial
7/18
Leader: Amazon Bedrock · Yes
· 2026-01-15
Trains on your data
No
7/18
Leader: DeepSeek · Yes
· 2026-01-15
AU region1st
Yes
1/18
· 2026-01-15
Traction1
API since3rd
2023
3/18
Leader: OpenAI · 2020
Positioning1
Positioning
Open-weight models you can host anywhere, forever
Alternatives8
Compare
Sources2
- www.llama.com/models/llama-4/2 fields
- www.llama.com/llama-downloads/1 field