Overall in llm apis
1of 18 · score 76.6
Data coverage
85%
23 of 27 fields sourced
Best for
- •EU data-residency requirements that rule out US-hosted inference
- •On-premise deployment with a commercial support contract
- •Teams that want an open-weight escape hatch under the hosted API
Strong on
- +Notice period 180 days 1/7
- +$/M cache read $0.05/M tok 2/12
- +MCP support Partial 3/18
Weak on
- −Context window 256,000 tokens 10/14Better: Anthropic: 1,000,000 tokens
vs Groq
- •Ahead on Effort control: Partial vs No
- •Ahead on MCP support: Partial vs No
- •Behind on Zero retention: Partial vs Yes
- •Behind on $/M input: $0.5/M tok vs $0.05/M tok
How Mistral AI scores among 18 llm apis23 of 27 fields known
Capability7
Max output
—
Performance2
TTFT p50
—
Output tok/s
—
Pricing4
Agentic6
Schema output1st
Yes
1/18
· 2026-01-15
Effort control
Partial
5/18
Leader: Anthropic · Yes
· 2026-01-15
Computer use
No
5/18
Leader: Anthropic · Yes
· 2026-01-15
MCP support3rd
Partial
3/18
Leader: Anthropic · Yes
· 2026-01-15
Cache TTL
—
Governance & continuity6
Continuity policy
Dated model IDs (the -2411 style suffix) are stable and documented, and Mistral maintains a legacy-model page listing deprecation and retirement dates. The stronger guarantee is structural: for the Apache-licensed models you can keep serving the same weights yourself after the endpoint goes away.
· 2026-01-15
Zero retention
Partial
7/18
Leader: Amazon Bedrock · Yes
· 2026-01-15
Trains on your data
No
7/18
Leader: DeepSeek · Yes
· 2026-01-15
AU region
No
9/18
Leader: Google Gemini · Yes
· 2026-01-15
Traction1
API since3rd
2023
3/18
Leader: OpenAI · 2020
Positioning1
Positioning
European models with open weights and deployable anywhere