Zero
Sync engine that puts a queryable client cache in front of your own Postgres.
Overall in convex alternatives
3of 11 · score 70.8
Data coverage
92%
24 of 26 fields sourced
Best for
- •Teams with an existing Postgres who want a UI that feels local
- •Apps where snappy reads matter but ownership of the data model is non-negotiable
- •Adding sync incrementally rather than rewriting onto a backend platform
Strong on
- +Local-first sync Yes 1/11
- +TS inference Yes 1/11
- +Optimistic writes Yes 1/11
- +Schema changes sql-migrations 1/11
Weak on
- −Auth bring-your-own 8/11Better: Supabase: built-in
- −MCP server No 8/11Better: Convex: Yes
- −File storage No 8/11Better: Convex: Yes
- −Egress metered No 8/9Better: Convex: Yes
vs ElectricSQL
- •Ahead on TS inference: Yes vs Partial
- •Ahead on Local-first sync: Yes vs Partial
- •Behind on Egress metered: No vs Partial
- •Behind on Exit cost: 3 vs 2
How Zero scores among 11 convex alternatives24 of 26 fields known
Features13
Transactions1st
mvcc
1/11
Cron & scheduling
No
7/11
Leader: Convex · Yes
File storage
No
8/11
Leader: Convex · Yes
Vector search
Partial
6/11
Leader: Convex · Yes
Full-text search
Partial
5/11
Leader: Convex · Yes
Hard limits
Client cache size is the practical ceiling, the query set you sync has to fit on the device.
Cold start
—
Function timeout
—
Portability & exit5
Exit cost
3
5/11
Leader: Neon + Drizzle · 1
Bulk export1st
Yes
1/11
Raw SQL1st
Yes
1/11
Schema changes1st
sql-migrations
1/11
Agentic2
MCP server
No
8/11
Leader: Convex · Yes
Agent fit
3
5/11
Leader: Convex · 5
Pricing3
Pricing model
free (self-host)
Entry price1st
$0/mo
1/10
Egress metered
No
8/9
Leader: Convex · Yes
Traction2
GitHub stars
3,000
10/10
Leader: Supabase · 90,000
Backing3rd
venture-backed
3/11
Leader: Firebase · big-tech
Positioning1
Alternatives8
Compare
Sources5
- zero.rocicorp.dev/docs3 fields
- zero.rocicorp.dev/docs/zero-schema1 field
- zero.rocicorp.dev/docs/auth1 field
- zero.rocicorp.dev/docs/deployment1 field
- zero.rocicorp.dev1 field