Storj
Decentralised erasure-coded storage: USD 4/TB stored, USD 7/TB egress, no regions.
Overall in s3-compatible storage
5of 12 · score 77.1
Data coverage
96%
27 of 28 fields sourced
Best for
- •Large-object distribution, datasets, model weights, video masters
- •Backups where surviving a whole-region failure matters more than latency
- •Workloads that benefit from delegatable, expiring, prefix-scoped access grants
Strong on
- +Replication model erasure-coded 3/12
- +IAM granularity 4 3/12
- +Storage $/TB/mo $7/TB/mo 3/11
- +Uptime SLA 99.95% 3/11
- +True cost from Sydney (AUD) A$59.28/mo 3/6
Weak on
- −Lifecycle rules No 11/12Better: Cloudflare R2: Yes
- −S3 API coverage 80% 8/12Better: AWS S3: 100%
- −TTFB from Sydney 150ms 7/10Better: Bunny Storage: 20ms
vs iDrive e2
- •Ahead on CDN integration: partner vs none
- •Ahead on Replication model: erasure-coded vs single-az
- •Behind on Lifecycle rules: No vs Partial
- •Behind on Egress $/TB: $7/TB vs $0/TB
How Storj scores among 12 s3-compatible storage27 of 28 fields known
Pricing10
True cost /mo (AUD)
A$59.28/mo
5/9
Leader: Hetzner Object Storage · A$18.95/mo
· 2026-07-23
True cost from Sydney (AUD)3rd
A$59.28/mo
3/6
Leader: Cloudflare R2 · A$34.56/mo
· 2026-07-23
Min retention1st
0ms
1/12
Min billed object1st
0 B
1/12
Features & API11
S3 API coverage
80%
8/12
Leader: AWS S3 · 100%
Presigned URLs1st
Yes
1/12
Multipart upload1st
Yes
1/12
Event notifications
No
6/12
Leader: Cloudflare R2 · Yes
CDN integration
partner
7/12
Leader: Cloudflare R2 · free-bundled
Max object size1st
5 TB
1/11
IAM granularity3rd
4
3/12
Leader: MinIO · 5
Sydney region
Partial
7/11
Leader: Wasabi · Yes
TTFB from Sydney
150ms
7/10
Leader: Bunny Storage · 20ms
Durability & Retention4
Agentic1
Official MCP server
No
5/12
Leader: Cloudflare R2 · Yes
Traction1
GA year
2020
5/12
Leader: Tigris · 2024
Positioning1
Positioning
Decentralised storage sold on price and on surviving whole-facility failure.