Triplit
Full-stack database that syncs: local cache, server, relational queries, offline.
Overall in convex alternatives
11of 11 · score 50.9
Data coverage
77%
20 of 26 fields sourced
Best for
- •Offline-first apps that need relational queries rather than document blobs
- •Teams happy to supply their own auth and file handling
- •Projects where sync correctness matters more than ecosystem size
Strong on
- +Local-first sync Yes 1/11
- +TS inference Yes 1/11
- +Optimistic writes Yes 1/11
Weak on
- −Auth bring-your-own 8/11Better: Supabase: built-in
- −MCP server No 8/11Better: Convex: Yes
- −File storage No 8/11Better: Convex: Yes
- −Full-text search No 9/11Better: Convex: Yes
vs ElectricSQL
- •Ahead on TS inference: Yes vs Partial
- •Ahead on Local-first sync: Yes vs Partial
- •Behind on Raw SQL: No vs Yes
- •Behind on Exit cost: 4 vs 2
How Triplit scores among 11 convex alternatives20 of 26 fields known
Features13
Transactions
occ
7/11
Leader: Supabase · mvcc
Cron & scheduling
No
7/11
Leader: Convex · Yes
File storage
No
8/11
Leader: Convex · Yes
Vector search
No
8/11
Leader: Convex · Yes
Full-text search
No
9/11
Leader: Convex · Yes
Auth
bring-your-own
8/11
Leader: Supabase · built-in
Hard limits
—
Cold start
—
Function timeout
—
Portability & exit5
Exit cost
4
8/11
Leader: Neon + Drizzle · 1
Bulk export
Partial
8/11
Leader: Convex · Yes
Raw SQL
No
7/11
Leader: Supabase · Yes
Agentic2
MCP server
No
8/11
Leader: Convex · Yes
Agent fit
3
5/11
Leader: Convex · 5
Pricing3
Pricing model
—
Entry price
—
Egress metered
—
Traction2
GitHub stars
4,000
9/10
Leader: Supabase · 90,000
Backing3rd
venture-backed
3/11
Leader: Firebase · big-tech
Positioning1
Alternatives8
Compare
Sources4
- www.triplit.dev/docs3 fields
- www.triplit.dev/docs/schemas2 fields
- www.triplit.dev/docs/self-hosting1 field
- www.triplit.dev1 field