8 Best Bunny Storage Alternatives (2026)

The closest alternatives to Bunny Storage are AWS S3, Backblaze B2, Cloudflare R2 and DigitalOcean Spaces, with 4 more below. Each shares a comparison category with it, so every rationale here names both tools' real values. Bunny Storage is 12th of 12 on S3 API coverage (30 %), usually where a switch starts.

Website Docs S3-compatible storage

Why do people look for Bunny Storage alternatives?

Most people searching for Bunny Storage alternatives are not shopping, they already run it and something has stopped fitting.
That something is usually a specific number rather than a feeling.
This page starts from the fields where Bunny Storage genuinely trails the rosters it appears in, and only then covers the reasons that never show up in a table.

The measured reasons.

S3 API coverage, 30 %, the weakest of the 12 here. AWS S3 records 100 %.
Versioning, No. Backblaze B2 records Yes.
Object lock / WORM, No. Backblaze B2 records Yes.
Lifecycle rules, No. Cloudflare R2 records Yes.
IAM granularity, 2, 11th of 12. MinIO records 5.

Any one of those is enough on its own if you sized your architecture around it.
None of them is enough if you didn't, which is why the list is short and specific rather than a general case against Bunny Storage.

The reasons that never make it into a table.

A price rise after a funding round.
A licence change that turns a self-host into a subscription.
A region you now need and they do not have.
An acquisition.
A support experience that quietly degrades.
None of those are fields, and all of them move teams, which is why every entry below links back to S3-compatible storage, where the full field set and its sources live.
The ones we catch get logged on the Bunny Storage timeline.

How the shortlist is ordered.

Every tool below shares at least one comparison category with Bunny Storage, sorted by how many categories the two overlap in.
There is no editorial ranking, no sponsorship and no affiliate link, the order is the overlap count.
The rationale under each is generated from the two tools' own cells, so it names real values rather than adjectives.

1.AWS S3

AWS S3, The API everything else copies, and by far the most expensive egress in this roster.
It meets Bunny Storage in S3-compatible storage.
It is ahead on S3 API coverage (100 % against 30 %), Versioning (Yes against No) and Object lock / WORM (Yes against No).
What you give up: Egress $/TB ($90 /TB, where Bunny Storage records $10 /TB) and True cost /mo (USD) ($472.6 /mo, where Bunny Storage records $60 /mo).
Best for workloads already inside AWS where traffic stays on the internal network.
Still the most capable object store, and thirty-eight times Hetzner's cost here, almost entirely bandwidth.

Where AWS S3 and Bunny Storage actually differ

S3 API coverage: 100%Bunny Storage: 30 %
Egress $/TB: $90/TBBunny Storage: $10 /TB
True cost /mo (USD): $472.6/moBunny Storage: $60 /mo
Versioning: YesBunny Storage: No
Object lock / WORM: YesBunny Storage: No
Lifecycle rules: YesBunny Storage: No

AWS S3 profile Compare in S3-compatible storage

2.Backblaze B2

Backblaze B2, Cheap US and EU object storage with free egress up to three times stored volume.
It meets Bunny Storage in S3-compatible storage.
It is ahead on Versioning (Yes against No), Object lock / WORM (Yes against No) and S3 API coverage (85 % against 30 %).
What you give up: Sydney region (No, where Bunny Storage records Yes) and Replication model (single-az, where Bunny Storage records multi-region).
Best for backup and archive targets where object lock matters and latency does not.
The sensible cheap, feature-complete middle, but no APAC region rules it out for Australia.

Where Backblaze B2 and Bunny Storage actually differ

Sydney region: NoBunny Storage: Yes
Versioning: YesBunny Storage: No
Object lock / WORM: YesBunny Storage: No
S3 API coverage: 85%Bunny Storage: 30 %
Lifecycle rules: YesBunny Storage: No
Event notifications: YesBunny Storage: No

Backblaze B2 profile Compare in S3-compatible storage

3.Cloudflare R2

Cloudflare R2, S3-compatible object storage with zero egress fees, on Cloudflare's network.
It meets Bunny Storage in S3-compatible storage.
It is ahead on Lifecycle rules (Yes against No), Event notifications (Yes against No) and S3 API coverage (82 % against 30 %).
What you give up: Class A $/M ops ($4.5 /M ops, where Bunny Storage records $0 /M ops) and Class B $/M ops ($0.36 /M ops, where Bunny Storage records $0 /M ops).
Best for public assets, media and package registries where egress dwarfs storage.
The default for read-heavy work, the only provider where egress stops being a line item.

Where Cloudflare R2 and Bunny Storage actually differ

Lifecycle rules: YesBunny Storage: No
Event notifications: YesBunny Storage: No
S3 API coverage: 82%Bunny Storage: 30 %
Multipart upload: YesBunny Storage: No
Official MCP server: YesBunny Storage: No
Class A $/M ops: $4.5/M opsBunny Storage: $0 /M ops

Cloudflare R2 profile Compare in S3-compatible storage

4.DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces, Bundled object storage plus free CDN, priced as a flat base fee with overages.
It meets Bunny Storage in S3-compatible storage.
It is ahead on Multipart upload (Yes against No), S3 API coverage (78 % against 30 %) and Lifecycle rules (Partial against No).
What you give up: Replication model (single-az, where Bunny Storage records multi-region) and Storage $/TB/mo ($20 /TB/mo, where Bunny Storage records $10 /TB/mo).
Best for static assets and user uploads served from Sydney with a bundled CDN.
Buy it for the bundling and Sydney region, not the feature set; no versioning or bucket events.

Where DigitalOcean Spaces and Bunny Storage actually differ

Multipart upload: YesBunny Storage: No
S3 API coverage: 78%Bunny Storage: 30 %
Replication model: single-azBunny Storage: multi-region
Lifecycle rules: PartialBunny Storage: No
Official MCP server: PartialBunny Storage: No
Storage $/TB/mo: $20/TB/moBunny Storage: $10 /TB/mo

DigitalOcean Spaces profile Compare in S3-compatible storage

5.Hetzner Object Storage

Hetzner Object Storage, The cheapest credible S3 endpoint in Europe, with a deliberately thin feature set.
It meets Bunny Storage in S3-compatible storage.
It is ahead on Multipart upload (Yes against No), S3 API coverage (70 % against 30 %) and Lifecycle rules (Partial against No).
What you give up: Sydney region (No, where Bunny Storage records Yes) and TTFB from Sydney (300 ms, where Bunny Storage records 20 ms).
Best for CI artefacts, build caches and cold backups where the bill is the point.
Wins the headline number by a mile but loses on features; great for caches, wrong as a system of record.

Where Hetzner Object Storage and Bunny Storage actually differ

Sydney region: NoBunny Storage: Yes
TTFB from Sydney: 300msBunny Storage: 20 ms
Multipart upload: YesBunny Storage: No
CDN integration: diyBunny Storage: free-bundled
Replication model: single-azBunny Storage: multi-region
S3 API coverage: 70%Bunny Storage: 30 %

Hetzner Object Storage profile Compare in S3-compatible storage

6.iDrive e2

iDrive e2, USD 4/TB S3-compatible storage with zero-egress marketing and a fair-use cap.
It meets Bunny Storage in S3-compatible storage.
It is ahead on Versioning (Yes against No), Object lock / WORM (Yes against No) and Multipart upload (Yes against No).
What you give up: CDN integration (none, where Bunny Storage records free-bundled) and Replication model (single-az, where Bunny Storage records multi-region).
Best for backup and MSP workloads where storage volume dominates and reads are rare.
Cheapest storage alongside Storj, object lock included, but egress terms too illegible to price; fine for backups.

Where iDrive e2 and Bunny Storage actually differ

Versioning: YesBunny Storage: No
CDN integration: noneBunny Storage: free-bundled
Object lock / WORM: YesBunny Storage: No
Multipart upload: YesBunny Storage: No
S3 API coverage: 80%Bunny Storage: 30 %
Replication model: single-azBunny Storage: multi-region

iDrive e2 profile Compare in S3-compatible storage

7.MinIO

MinIO, The self-hosted S3 reference implementation, your hardware, your bandwidth, your SLA.
It meets Bunny Storage in S3-compatible storage.
It is ahead on S3 API coverage (98 % against 30 %), Versioning (Yes against No) and Object lock / WORM (Yes against No).
What you give up: CDN integration (diy, where Bunny Storage records free-bundled) and Replication model (erasure-coded, where Bunny Storage records multi-region).
Best for on-premises or air-gapped deployments where data cannot leave your control.
The reference point, not a competitor; run it only if you already operate storage hardware.
Note that we carry MinIO as the do-it-yourself baseline in that roster, the "what if we just ran this ourselves" reference point.
The honest answer is usually that it is cheaper and considerably more work.

Where MinIO and Bunny Storage actually differ

S3 API coverage: 98%Bunny Storage: 30 %
Versioning: YesBunny Storage: No
Object lock / WORM: YesBunny Storage: No
Lifecycle rules: YesBunny Storage: No
Event notifications: YesBunny Storage: No
IAM granularity: 5Bunny Storage: 2

MinIO profile Compare in S3-compatible storage

8.Scaleway Object Storage

Scaleway Object Storage, European-sovereign S3 storage with multi-AZ classes and a real IAM system.
It meets Bunny Storage in S3-compatible storage.
It is ahead on Versioning (Yes against No), Object lock / WORM (Yes against No) and S3 API coverage (85 % against 30 %).
What you give up: Sydney region (No, where Bunny Storage records Yes) and TTFB from Sydney (300 ms, where Bunny Storage records 20 ms).
Best for EU data residency obligations with a European legal entity behind them.
The most feature-complete non-hyperscaler, but 300 ms away; pick it when EU data residency is required.

Where Scaleway Object Storage and Bunny Storage actually differ

Sydney region: NoBunny Storage: Yes
Versioning: YesBunny Storage: No
Object lock / WORM: YesBunny Storage: No
TTFB from Sydney: 300msBunny Storage: 20 ms
S3 API coverage: 85%Bunny Storage: 30 %
Lifecycle rules: YesBunny Storage: No

Scaleway Object Storage profile Compare in S3-compatible storage

How this list was built

There is no editorial ranking on this page and no sponsorship behind it. The order is mechanical: every tool that shares a comparison category with Bunny Storage, sorted by how many categories the two overlap in. A tool that meets Bunny Storage in three rosters sits above one that meets it in a single roster, because more overlap means the comparison is more like-for-like.

The rationale under each entry is composed from the two tools' own cells. Where they differ on a field we score, the sentence names both values and the unit. Where they don't differ, it says so instead of manufacturing a distinction, which is why some entries are short.

Values, sources and verification dates all live on the category tables: S3-compatible storage. If a figure here disagrees with a vendor's current pricing page, the vendor is right and we are stale.

Still deciding whether to move at all? The Bunny Storage profile has the when-to-use and when-not-to-use blocks, and the Bunny Storage timeline has the dated changes that usually trigger a migration.