8 Best DigitalOcean Spaces Alternatives (2026)

The closest alternatives to DigitalOcean Spaces are AWS S3, Backblaze B2, Bunny Storage and Cloudflare R2, with 4 more below. Each shares a comparison category with it, so every rationale here names both tools' real values. DigitalOcean Spaces is marked No on Versioning, where Backblaze B2 records Yes, usually where a switch starts.

Website Docs DigitalOcean Spaces logo & brand assets S3-compatible storage

Why do people look for DigitalOcean Spaces alternatives?

Most people searching for DigitalOcean Spaces alternatives are not shopping, they already run it and something has stopped fitting.
That something is usually a specific number rather than a feeling.
This page starts from the fields where DigitalOcean Spaces genuinely trails the rosters it appears in, and only then covers the reasons that never show up in a table.

The measured reasons.

Versioning, No. Backblaze B2 records Yes.
Object lock / WORM, No. Backblaze B2 records Yes.
Storage $/TB/mo, $20 /TB/mo, 9th of 11. Storj records $4 /TB/mo.
Replication model, single-az, 8th of 12. Tigris records multi-region.

Any one of those is enough on its own if you sized your architecture around it.
None of them is enough if you didn't, which is why the list is short and specific rather than a general case against DigitalOcean Spaces.

The reasons that never make it into a table.

A price rise after a funding round.
A licence change that turns a self-host into a subscription.
A region you now need and they do not have.
An acquisition.
A support experience that quietly degrades.
None of those are fields, and all of them move teams, which is why every entry below links back to S3-compatible storage, where the full field set and its sources live.
The ones we catch get logged on the DigitalOcean Spaces timeline.

How the shortlist is ordered.

Every tool below shares at least one comparison category with DigitalOcean Spaces, sorted by how many categories the two overlap in.
There is no editorial ranking, no sponsorship and no affiliate link, the order is the overlap count.
The rationale under each is generated from the two tools' own cells, so it names real values rather than adjectives.

1.AWS S3

AWS S3, The API everything else copies, and by far the most expensive egress in this roster.
It meets DigitalOcean Spaces in S3-compatible storage.
It is ahead on Versioning (Yes against No), Object lock / WORM (Yes against No) and Event notifications (Yes against No).
What you give up: Egress $/TB ($90 /TB, where DigitalOcean Spaces records $10 /TB) and True cost /mo (USD) ($472.6 /mo, where DigitalOcean Spaces records $60 /mo).
Best for workloads already inside AWS where traffic stays on the internal network.
Still the most capable object store, and thirty-eight times Hetzner's cost here, almost entirely bandwidth.

Where AWS S3 and DigitalOcean Spaces actually differ

Egress $/TB: $90/TBDigitalOcean Spaces: $10 /TB
True cost /mo (USD): $472.6/moDigitalOcean Spaces: $60 /mo
Versioning: YesDigitalOcean Spaces: No
Object lock / WORM: YesDigitalOcean Spaces: No
Event notifications: YesDigitalOcean Spaces: No
Class A $/M ops: $5/M opsDigitalOcean Spaces: $0 /M ops

AWS S3 profile Compare in S3-compatible storage

2.Backblaze B2

Backblaze B2, Cheap US and EU object storage with free egress up to three times stored volume.
It meets DigitalOcean Spaces in S3-compatible storage.
It is ahead on Versioning (Yes against No), Object lock / WORM (Yes against No) and Event notifications (Yes against No).
What you give up: Sydney region (No, where DigitalOcean Spaces records Yes) and TTFB from Sydney (180 ms, where DigitalOcean Spaces records 25 ms).
Best for backup and archive targets where object lock matters and latency does not.
The sensible cheap, feature-complete middle, but no APAC region rules it out for Australia.

Where Backblaze B2 and DigitalOcean Spaces actually differ

Sydney region: NoDigitalOcean Spaces: Yes
Versioning: YesDigitalOcean Spaces: No
Object lock / WORM: YesDigitalOcean Spaces: No
Event notifications: YesDigitalOcean Spaces: No
Storage $/TB/mo: $6.95/TB/moDigitalOcean Spaces: $20 /TB/mo
TTFB from Sydney: 180msDigitalOcean Spaces: 25 ms

Backblaze B2 profile Compare in S3-compatible storage

3.Bunny Storage

Bunny Storage, Edge storage built as a CDN origin, with its own API rather than a faithful S3 one.
It meets DigitalOcean Spaces in S3-compatible storage.
It is ahead on Replication model (multi-region against single-az), Storage $/TB/mo ($10 /TB/mo against $20 /TB/mo) and GA year (2019 against 2017).
What you give up: Multipart upload (No, where DigitalOcean Spaces records Yes) and S3 API coverage (30 %, where DigitalOcean Spaces records 78 %).
Best for static sites, images and video served to a global audience through Bunny's CDN.
A CDN origin with storage attached, not an object store; superb Sydney delivery, but no S3 semantics.

Where Bunny Storage and DigitalOcean Spaces actually differ

Multipart upload: NoDigitalOcean Spaces: Yes
S3 API coverage: 30%DigitalOcean Spaces: 78 %
Replication model: multi-regionDigitalOcean Spaces: single-az
Lifecycle rules: NoDigitalOcean Spaces: Partial
Official MCP server: NoDigitalOcean Spaces: Partial
Storage $/TB/mo: $10/TB/moDigitalOcean Spaces: $20 /TB/mo

Bunny Storage profile Compare in S3-compatible storage

4.Cloudflare R2

Cloudflare R2, S3-compatible object storage with zero egress fees, on Cloudflare's network.
It meets DigitalOcean Spaces in S3-compatible storage.
It is ahead on Event notifications (Yes against No), Object lock / WORM (Partial against No) and Lifecycle rules (Yes against Partial).
What you give up: Class A $/M ops ($4.5 /M ops, where DigitalOcean Spaces records $0 /M ops) and Class B $/M ops ($0.36 /M ops, where DigitalOcean Spaces records $0 /M ops).
Best for public assets, media and package registries where egress dwarfs storage.
The default for read-heavy work, the only provider where egress stops being a line item.

Where Cloudflare R2 and DigitalOcean Spaces actually differ

Event notifications: YesDigitalOcean Spaces: No
Class A $/M ops: $4.5/M opsDigitalOcean Spaces: $0 /M ops
Class B $/M ops: $0.36/M opsDigitalOcean Spaces: $0 /M ops
Object lock / WORM: PartialDigitalOcean Spaces: No
Sydney region: PartialDigitalOcean Spaces: Yes
Lifecycle rules: YesDigitalOcean Spaces: Partial

Cloudflare R2 profile Compare in S3-compatible storage

5.Hetzner Object Storage

Hetzner Object Storage, The cheapest credible S3 endpoint in Europe, with a deliberately thin feature set.
It meets DigitalOcean Spaces in S3-compatible storage.
It is ahead on Storage $/TB/mo ($6.95 /TB/mo against $20 /TB/mo), GA year (2024 against 2017) and True cost /mo (USD) ($12.47 /mo against $60 /mo).
What you give up: Sydney region (No, where DigitalOcean Spaces records Yes) and TTFB from Sydney (300 ms, where DigitalOcean Spaces records 25 ms).
Best for CI artefacts, build caches and cold backups where the bill is the point.
Wins the headline number by a mile but loses on features; great for caches, wrong as a system of record.

Where Hetzner Object Storage and DigitalOcean Spaces actually differ

Sydney region: NoDigitalOcean Spaces: Yes
TTFB from Sydney: 300msDigitalOcean Spaces: 25 ms
CDN integration: diyDigitalOcean Spaces: free-bundled
Storage $/TB/mo: $6.95/TB/moDigitalOcean Spaces: $20 /TB/mo
Official MCP server: NoDigitalOcean Spaces: Partial
IAM granularity: 2DigitalOcean Spaces: 3

Hetzner Object Storage profile Compare in S3-compatible storage

6.iDrive e2

iDrive e2, USD 4/TB S3-compatible storage with zero-egress marketing and a fair-use cap.
It meets DigitalOcean Spaces in S3-compatible storage.
It is ahead on Versioning (Yes against No), Object lock / WORM (Yes against No) and Storage $/TB/mo ($4 /TB/mo against $20 /TB/mo).
What you give up: CDN integration (none, where DigitalOcean Spaces records free-bundled) and Official MCP server (No, where DigitalOcean Spaces records Partial).
Best for backup and MSP workloads where storage volume dominates and reads are rare.
Cheapest storage alongside Storj, object lock included, but egress terms too illegible to price; fine for backups.

Where iDrive e2 and DigitalOcean Spaces actually differ

Versioning: YesDigitalOcean Spaces: No
CDN integration: noneDigitalOcean Spaces: free-bundled
Object lock / WORM: YesDigitalOcean Spaces: No
Storage $/TB/mo: $4/TB/moDigitalOcean Spaces: $20 /TB/mo
Official MCP server: NoDigitalOcean Spaces: Partial
GA year: 2,021DigitalOcean Spaces: 2017

iDrive e2 profile Compare in S3-compatible storage

7.MinIO

MinIO, The self-hosted S3 reference implementation, your hardware, your bandwidth, your SLA.
It meets DigitalOcean Spaces in S3-compatible storage.
It is ahead on Versioning (Yes against No), Object lock / WORM (Yes against No) and Event notifications (Yes against No).
What you give up: CDN integration (diy, where DigitalOcean Spaces records free-bundled) and GA year (2015, where DigitalOcean Spaces records 2017).
Best for on-premises or air-gapped deployments where data cannot leave your control.
The reference point, not a competitor; run it only if you already operate storage hardware.
Note that we carry MinIO as the do-it-yourself baseline in that roster, the "what if we just ran this ourselves" reference point.
The honest answer is usually that it is cheaper and considerably more work.

Where MinIO and DigitalOcean Spaces actually differ

Versioning: YesDigitalOcean Spaces: No
Object lock / WORM: YesDigitalOcean Spaces: No
Event notifications: YesDigitalOcean Spaces: No
CDN integration: diyDigitalOcean Spaces: free-bundled
IAM granularity: 5DigitalOcean Spaces: 3
Replication model: erasure-codedDigitalOcean Spaces: single-az

MinIO profile Compare in S3-compatible storage

8.Scaleway Object Storage

Scaleway Object Storage, European-sovereign S3 storage with multi-AZ classes and a real IAM system.
It meets DigitalOcean Spaces in S3-compatible storage.
It is ahead on Versioning (Yes against No), Object lock / WORM (Yes against No) and Lifecycle rules (Yes against Partial).
What you give up: Sydney region (No, where DigitalOcean Spaces records Yes) and TTFB from Sydney (300 ms, where DigitalOcean Spaces records 25 ms).
Best for EU data residency obligations with a European legal entity behind them.
The most feature-complete non-hyperscaler, but 300 ms away; pick it when EU data residency is required.

Where Scaleway Object Storage and DigitalOcean Spaces actually differ

Sydney region: NoDigitalOcean Spaces: Yes
Versioning: YesDigitalOcean Spaces: No
Object lock / WORM: YesDigitalOcean Spaces: No
TTFB from Sydney: 300msDigitalOcean Spaces: 25 ms
Official MCP server: NoDigitalOcean Spaces: Partial
Lifecycle rules: YesDigitalOcean Spaces: Partial

Scaleway Object Storage profile Compare in S3-compatible storage

How this list was built

There is no editorial ranking on this page and no sponsorship behind it. The order is mechanical: every tool that shares a comparison category with DigitalOcean Spaces, sorted by how many categories the two overlap in. A tool that meets DigitalOcean Spaces in three rosters sits above one that meets it in a single roster, because more overlap means the comparison is more like-for-like.

The rationale under each entry is composed from the two tools' own cells. Where they differ on a field we score, the sentence names both values and the unit. Where they don't differ, it says so instead of manufacturing a distinction, which is why some entries are short.

Values, sources and verification dates all live on the category tables: S3-compatible storage. If a figure here disagrees with a vendor's current pricing page, the vendor is right and we are stale.

Still deciding whether to move at all? The DigitalOcean Spaces profile has the when-to-use and when-not-to-use blocks, and the DigitalOcean Spaces timeline has the dated changes that usually trigger a migration.