Nhost logo

Nhost

Nhost is postgres plus Hasura GraphQL, auth, storage and serverless functions. We compare it in Convex alternatives. It is one of only 4 of 11 tools in its roster with Full-text search. The trade-off is being 6th of 9 on Entry price ($25 /mo).

What is Nhost?

Nhost, PostgresPostgreSQL logo plus Hasura GraphQL, auth, storage and serverless functions. Nhost is the GraphQL-shaped take on the SupabaseSupabase logo idea: managed PostgresPostgreSQL logo with Hasura in front of it, plus an auth service, S3-compatible storage and Node functions. Realtime is Hasura subscriptions, which are an efficient server-side diff pushed to clients. Everything underneath is standard, PostgresPostgreSQL logo, Hasura metadata, SQL migrations, which makes it one of the easier platforms here to walk away from. Founded 2020. Venture-backed. Open source.

We track it in 1 comparison, Convex alternatives, so every claim below is a cell in a table you can open and check rather than an impression. Across those rosters it sits against 10 other tools, and what follows is where it visibly separates from them.

Where it wins.

  • Full-text search, Yes, which only 4 of 11 tools here manage.
  • Exit cost, 2, 2nd of 11.

Each of those is ranked against the whole roster on its category page, not against a hand-picked subset, so a first place here means first of everything we list.

Where it gives ground.

  • Entry price, $25 /mo, 6th of 9. FirebaseFirebase logo records $0 /mo.
  • GitHub stars, 8,000, 6th of 10. SupabaseSupabase logo records 90,000.
  • Optimistic writes, No. ConvexConvex logo records Yes.

None of these disqualify it on their own. They are the fields to check against your own requirements before you commit, because they are the ones where a competitor genuinely does better.

Provenance. 24 of 26 tracked fields carry a value for Nhost, and 7 of those cite a document you can open. Last verified 2026-07-20. Every figure keeps its own provenance, measured by us, claimed by the vendor, inferred, or community-reported, and we would rather print a dash than a guess.

Its nearest neighbour in our data is AppwriteAppwrite logo. Nhost is ahead on Transactions (mvcc against none) and Raw SQL (Yes against No). AppwriteAppwrite logo takes GitHub stars (52,000 against 8,000) and Entry price ($15 /mo against $25 /mo). That pattern repeats across the rest of the roster, see Nhost alternatives for the other rivals, each compared the same way.

At a glance
Founded
2020
Funding
Venture-backed
Licence
Open source
Fields we track
24 of 26
Last verified
2026-07-20

Nhost in Convex alternatives

Ranked against 11 tools across 26 sourced fields. Open the full Convex alternatives table.

An underrated exit: PostgresPostgreSQL logo plus open-source Hasura means both halves of the stack survive leaving. It is also the quietest project here, which you should weigh against how much you like GraphQL.

Where it lands in this roster
Exit cost
22nd of 11
Inferred
Entry price
$25 /mo6th of 9
Inferredsource
GitHub stars
8,0006th of 10
Inferred
Reactivity
push1st of 11
Vendor-claimedverified 2026-07-20source
Self-hostable
Yes1st of 11
Vendor-claimedverified 2026-07-20source
Transactions
mvcc1st of 11
Inferred
Local-first sync
No6th of 11
Inferred

When to use Nhost

Nhost is the right call in these situations, each one drawn from a field we actually record:

  • Teams already committed to GraphQL and Hasura.
  • Projects wanting managed convenience with a fully open stack underneath.
  • Anyone who wants SupabaseSupabase logo's portability but prefers subscriptions to change feeds.
  • Full-text search is your binding constraint. Nhost records Yes, which only 4 of the 11 tools in the ConvexConvex logo alternatives roster do. We define that field as first-party text indexing with relevance ranking.
  • Exit cost is your binding constraint. Nhost records 2, 2nd of 11 in the ConvexConvex logo alternatives roster. We define that field as 1-5 judgement score, lower is better, for how much application code must be rewritten to move off the platform, assuming the data is already extracted.

When not to use Nhost

Reach for something else when any of the following is a requirement rather than a nice-to-have:

  • Entry price. Nhost records $25 /mo, 6th of 9 in the ConvexConvex logo alternatives roster. FirebaseFirebase logo records $0 /mo on the same field. If that is a hard requirement rather than a preference, start elsewhere.
  • GitHub stars. Nhost records 8,000, 6th of 10 in the ConvexConvex logo alternatives roster. SupabaseSupabase logo records 90,000 on the same field. If that is a hard requirement rather than a preference, start elsewhere.
  • Optimistic writes. Nhost records No on the ConvexConvex logo alternatives table. ConvexConvex logo records Yes on the same field. If that is a hard requirement rather than a preference, start elsewhere.

We publish this block because a comparison that only lists what a tool is good at is marketing. Every figure above sits on the same page as its source, and the field definitions are on the category tables if you want to check how we measured them.

Options compared alongside Nhost

Everything below shares at least one comparison category with Nhost, ordered by how much overlap there is. For the reasoning on each, which fields it wins, which it loses, see Nhost alternatives.

Sources and gaps

What we don't know. 2 of the 26 fields we track for Nhost are still blank: Cold start and Function timeout. Those render as dashes rather than as zeroes or assumptions, because an empty cell and a bad cell are not the same thing and only one of them is honest. If you know any of these figures and can point at a document, tell us.

Every figure on this page traces back to a document you can open. Where a vendor claims a number we could not reproduce, the cell says so.