8 Best Supabase Alternatives (2026)
The closest alternatives to Supabase are Appwrite, Convex, ElectricSQL and Firebase, with 4 more below. Each shares a comparison category with it, so every rationale here names both tools' real values. Supabase is 6th of 9 on Entry price ($25 /mo), usually where a switch starts.
Why do people look for Supabase alternatives?
- Most people searching for Supabase alternatives are not shopping, they already run it and something has stopped fitting.
- That something is usually a specific number rather than a feeling.
- This page starts from the fields where Supabase genuinely trails the rosters it appears in, and only then covers the reasons that never show up in a table.
The measured reasons.
- Entry price, $25 /mo, 6th of 9. Firebase
records $0 /mo. - Function timeout, 2.5 min, the weakest of the 4 here. Firebase records 60 min.
- Optimistic writes, No. Convex
records Yes.
- Any one of those is enough on its own if you sized your architecture around it.
- None of them is enough if you didn't, which is why the list is short and specific rather than a general case against Supabase.
The reasons that never make it into a table.
- A price rise after a funding round.
- A licence change that turns a self-host into a subscription.
- A region you now need and they do not have.
- An acquisition.
- A support experience that quietly degrades.
- None of those are fields, and all of them move teams, which is why every entry below links back to Convex alternatives, where the full field set and its sources live.
- The ones we catch get logged on the Supabase timeline.
How the shortlist is ordered.
- Every tool below shares at least one comparison category with Supabase, sorted by how many categories the two overlap in.
- There is no editorial ranking, no sponsorship and no affiliate link, the order is the overlap count.
- The rationale under each is generated from the two tools' own cells, so it names real values rather than adjectives.
1.
Appwrite
- Appwrite, Open-source backend platform: databases, auth, storage, functions, self-hostable.
- It meets Supabase in Convex alternatives.
- It is ahead on Entry price ($15 /mo against $25 /mo) and Function timeout (15 min against 2.5 min).
- What you give up: Transactions (none, where Supabase records mvcc) and Raw SQL (No, where Supabase records Yes).
- Best for teams that must run the whole backend on their own infrastructure.
- The most complete self-hostable option, held back by console-first schema and the weakest transaction story here.
Where Appwrite and Supabase actually differ
Appwrite profileCompare in Convex alternatives- Transactions
- noneSupabase: mvcc Inferred
- Raw SQL
- NoSupabase: Yes Inferred
- Vector search
- NoSupabase: Yes Inferred
- Bulk export
- PartialSupabase: Yes Inferred
- Full-text search
- PartialSupabase: Yes Inferred
- GitHub stars
- 52,000Supabase: 90,000 Inferred
2.Convex
- Convex, Reactive TypeScript backend: database, functions and live queries in one project.
- It meets Supabase in Convex alternatives.
- It is ahead on Optimistic writes (Yes against No), TS inference (Yes against Partial) and Agent fit (5 against 4).
- What you give up: Raw SQL (No, where Supabase records Yes) and GitHub stars (8,000, where Supabase records 90,000).
- Best for small teams shipping realtime-shaped product fast.
- Fastest empty-repo-to-realtime path here, but a 4 on exit cost with no SQL escape hatch.
Where Convex and Supabase actually differ
Convex profileConvex vs SupabaseCompare in Convex alternatives- GitHub stars
- 8,000Supabase: 90,000 Inferred
- Exit cost
- 4Supabase: 2 Inferred
- Auth
- first-party-addonSupabase: built-in Inferred
3.
ElectricSQL
- ElectricSQL, Postgres
read-path sync: stream subsets of your own database to clients over HTTP. - It meets Supabase in Convex alternatives.
- It is ahead on Local-first sync (Partial against No) and Optimistic writes (Partial against No).
- What you give up: Cron & scheduling (No, where Supabase records Yes) and Auth (bring-your-own, where Supabase records built-in).
- Best for existing Postgres apps that need live read data without a rewrite.
- The narrowest, best-behaved tool: read-path sync over your own Postgres with an exit close to free.
Where ElectricSQL and Supabase actually differ
ElectricSQL profileCompare in Convex alternatives- Cron & scheduling
- NoSupabase: Yes Inferred
- MCP server
- NoSupabase: Yes Inferred
- File storage
- NoSupabase: Yes Inferred
- GitHub stars
- 8,000Supabase: 90,000 Inferred
4.Firebase
- Firebase, Google's app platform: Firestore documents, auth, functions, deep mobile SDKs.
- It meets Supabase in Convex alternatives.
- It is ahead on Optimistic writes (Yes against No), Entry price ($0 /mo against $25 /mo) and Function timeout (60 min against 2.5 min).
- What you give up: Self-hostable (No, where Supabase records Yes) and Exit cost (5, where Supabase records 2).
- Best for consumer mobile apps where offline behaviour is the product.
- Best offline story and mobile SDKs, worst exit on the page; fine only if you never migrate.
Where Firebase and Supabase actually differ
Firebase profileFirebase vs SupabaseCompare in Convex alternatives- Exit cost
- 5Supabase: 2 Inferred
- Raw SQL
- NoSupabase: Yes Inferred
- Optimistic writes
- YesSupabase: No Inferred
5.
InstantDB
- InstantDB, Client-side reactive database with a relational graph model and instant sync.
- It meets Supabase in Convex alternatives.
- It is ahead on Local-first sync (Yes against No), Optimistic writes (Yes against No) and TS inference (Yes against Partial).
- What you give up: Raw SQL (No, where Supabase records Yes) and Cron & scheduling (No, where Supabase records Yes).
- Best for multiplayer or collaborative UIs where every interaction must feel local.
- The most pleasant DX for instant collaborative UIs; the missing server-side runtime is the constraint people hit.
Where InstantDB and Supabase actually differ
InstantDB profileCompare in Convex alternatives- Raw SQL
- NoSupabase: Yes Inferred
- Cron & scheduling
- NoSupabase: Yes Inferred
- Full-text search
- NoSupabase: Yes Inferred
- Vector search
- NoSupabase: Yes Inferred
6.
Neon + Drizzle
- Neon + Drizzle, The DIY baseline: serverless Postgres, a typed SQL query builder, nothing else.
- It meets Supabase in Convex alternatives.
- It is ahead on TS inference (Yes against Partial), Exit cost (1 against 2) and Backing (big-tech against venture-backed).
- What you give up: Reactivity (manual, where Supabase records push) and Cron & scheduling (No, where Supabase records Yes).
- Best for teams that already know what backend they want to build.
- Not a competitor, the yardstick: you build everything yourself, but nothing you build is owned by anyone else.
- Note that we carry Neon + Drizzle as the do-it-yourself baseline in that roster, the "what if we just ran this ourselves" reference point.
- The honest answer is usually that it is cheaper and considerably more work.
Where Neon + Drizzle and Supabase actually differ
Neon + Drizzle profileCompare in Convex alternatives- Reactivity
- manualSupabase: push Inferred
- Cron & scheduling
- NoSupabase: Yes Inferred
- Auth
- bring-your-ownSupabase: built-in Inferred
- File storage
- NoSupabase: Yes Inferred
- GitHub stars
- 18,000Supabase: 90,000 Inferred
7.
Nhost
- Nhost, Postgres plus Hasura GraphQL, auth, storage and serverless functions.
- It meets Supabase in Convex alternatives.
- Against that: GitHub stars (8,000, where Supabase records 90,000) and Agent fit (3, where Supabase records 4).
- Best for teams already committed to GraphQL and Hasura.
- An underrated exit: Postgres plus open-source Hasura both survive leaving, if you like GraphQL and quiet projects.
Where Nhost and Supabase actually differ
Nhost profileCompare in Convex alternatives- GitHub stars
- 8,000Supabase: 90,000 Inferred
- Agent fit
- 3Supabase: 4 Inferred
8.
PocketBase
- PocketBase, One Go binary: SQLite
database, auth, file storage, realtime and an admin UI. - It meets Supabase in Convex alternatives.
- It is ahead on Entry price ($0 /mo against $25 /mo) and Cold start (0 ms against 250 ms).
- What you give up: MCP server (No, where Supabase records Yes) and Egress metered (No, where Supabase records Yes).
- Best for internal tools and side projects where one VPS is plenty.
- Absurd value for single-machine workloads with the easiest extraction here; the ceiling is one writer, one box.
Where PocketBase and Supabase actually differ
PocketBase profileCompare in Convex alternatives- MCP server
- NoSupabase: Yes Inferred
- Egress metered
- NoSupabase: Yes Inferred
- Vector search
- NoSupabase: Yes Inferred
- Backing
- solo-maintainerSupabase: venture-backed Community-reported
- Cron & scheduling
- PartialSupabase: Yes Inferred
How this list was built
There is no editorial ranking on this page and no sponsorship behind it. The order is mechanical: every tool that shares a comparison category with Supabase, sorted by how many categories the two overlap in. A tool that meets Supabase in three rosters sits above one that meets it in a single roster, because more overlap means the comparison is more like-for-like.
The rationale under each entry is composed from the two tools' own cells. Where they differ on a field we score, the sentence names both values and the unit. Where they don't differ, it says so instead of manufacturing a distinction, which is why some entries are short.
Values, sources and verification dates all live on the category tables: Convex alternatives. If a figure here disagrees with a vendor's current pricing page, the vendor is right and we are stale.
Still deciding whether to move at all? The Supabase profile has the when-to-use and when-not-to-use blocks, and the Supabase timeline has the dated changes that usually trigger a migration.