Loops
Lifecycle and marketing email for SaaS, priced on contacts rather than sends.
Overall in email apis
9of 13 · score 56.4
Data coverage
84%
21 of 25 fields sourced
Best for
- •Onboarding sequences and product announcements
- •Small teams with no dedicated email engineer
- •Products where marketing and transactional should share one contact record
Strong on
- +llms.txt docs Yes 1/13
- +Product scope marketing-first 1/13
- +GA year 2023 1/13
- +Time to first send 15min 2/13
- +Shared pool quality 4 2/13
- +DKIM/DMARC friction 2 2/13
Weak on
- −React Email / MJML 11/13Better: Resend: react-email, mjml
- −IP warmup No 11/13Better: Postmark: Yes
- −Inbound parsing No 10/13Better: Postmark: Yes
- −Multi-domain sending No 13/13Better: Resend: Yes
vs Resend
- •Ahead on Throughput ceiling: 36,000 emails/hr vs 7,200 emails/hr
- •Ahead on Hosted templates: visual-editor vs code-editor
- •Behind on React Email / MJML: vs react-email, mjml
- •Behind on Multi-domain sending: No vs Yes
How Loops scores among 13 email apis21 of 25 fields known
Features10
Time to first send2nd
15min
2/13
Leader: Resend · 10min
Product scope1st
marketing-first
1/13
Inbound parsing
No
10/13
Leader: Postmark · Yes
Event webhooks
delivered, opened, clicked, bounced, complained, unsubscribed
8/13
Leader: Amazon SES · delivered, opened, clicked, bounced, complained, deferred, unsubscribed, inbound
Hosted templates1st
visual-editor
1/13
React Email / MJML
11/13
Leader: Resend · react-email, mjml
Log retention
—
Multi-domain sending
No
13/13
Leader: Resend · Yes
Data residency
us
9/13
Leader: Amazon SES · us, eu, au, apac, sa, ca
Deliverability6
IP warmup
No
11/13
Leader: Postmark · Yes
DKIM/DMARC friction2nd
2
2/13
Leader: Resend · 1
BIMI
—
Suppression list1st
Yes
1/13
Bounce handling1st
Yes
1/13
Pricing4
Agentic2
llms.txt docs1st
Yes
1/13
Traction1
Funding
seed
9/13
Leader: Amazon SES · subsidiary
Positioning1
Positioning
"Email for modern SaaS." Sells taste and speed of setup rather than deliverability engineering.
Timeline1
GA year1st
2023
1/13